Out of curiosity, how many of us are participating in the strike Gwyn called for over the trademark question? If a lot of you are, I apologize for seeming a strike-breaker, but I feel some one of us should cover the news.
I'll publish on this based on replies tonight around 7:30 SLT.
Bot Girl mentioned some good reasons for not participating, but I have more:
1) Until I hear about LL specifically and in writing refusing to allow entities to "grandfather" the use they started with permission before the new policy, I see no reason to get all excited about it.
2) I'm still seeing people complaining that their legitimate fair usage of the term Second Life is affected by the new policy, and that's a pile of steaming horse manure. And I'll keep saying that until I see copies of real "cease and desist" letters originating from LL's legal department.
(Not that I have *time* for blogging just now, but still.)
Hmm. It's true that I'm looking at it in isolation. If you're correct, this trend is something that's eventually going to wind up in court - whether through the Electronic Frontiers Foundation or some other free-speech outfit.
Not that that will necessarily stop companies from trying such tactics. Various companies are still making people sign completely unenforceable non-compete agreements, for example - because the expense of litigating such things is greater than most individuals are able to shoulder.
But I'm still not willing to believe they'll be quite so self-destructive. I mean, I know LL has a long history of public relations blunders, but turning into tyrannical squelchers of the very creativity and free speech they claim to support? I'll believe it when I see it.